RE: Objects, finally (try 1)

[Dan Sugalski]

At 11:44 AM -0800 1/14/03, Mr. Nobody wrote:

Seems pretty reasonable, but don't you mean PerlRef, PerlAttr, PerlClass,
PerlObject?

Nope. There's nothing particularly perlish about them, and if we're going to have a common base set of object functionality, they'll probably be named ParrotRef/Attr/Class/Object. They should suffice for perl, python, and ruby (at the very least) unless I've missed something.
--
Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk