I cleaned up all the pod errors last week and was going to report on that but got sidetracked when I realised that POD::Checker diverged somewhat from Perl's own pod standards, and that POD-Simple was the way to go. See http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/1092 for the details.
Once we have an html tree, I'm expecting that problems with the content will be more apparent and hence quicker to identify and solve.
For the moment the idea is just to build the html locally, though when it is respectable it would be good to have it also online.
I'll aim to have something decent in place for next release, so we can toot toot about it.
Mike
On 12 Jan 2004, at 15:33, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:52 AM +0000 1/12/04, Tim Bunce wrote:Has a date been set for the next release?
Nope. I suppose we could shoot for another holiday release, if someone's got a good february one.
Are the docs (especially the PDDs) upto date on best practices?
Alas not, no.
If not, will that be a goal for the next release?
Yeah, I think getting the docs better will be an aggressive goal for the next release.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
