On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:13:08PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > But (I thought) the idea was that every test needs the same setup. If > they're all in one method, they won't get that.
How's that? > Also, if you add lots of tests in a single method, (again as I understand) > they will stop after the first failure, which is not ideal if the rest of > the tests can still run. That's a feature. If they can still run, move them to a different method. > > You can group dependant tests into one method and have the method return > > or die at any point... > As above, they won't all get the setup/teardown. I really don't understand what you're getting at here. Tony
