On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:11:06AM -0000, Clayton, Nik wrote:
> > At the very least some better name than ok2().
> 
> Name suggestions gratefully received.  I wanted something short, to make
> it easier than "ok(1 == 1, "");", and ok2() fits in with the historical
> naming of functions like wait(), wait2(), wait3(), wait4(), and so on.

Just because everybody else jumps off a bridge... ;)  

You can almost always come up with something better than just numbering
the functions.

wait  == wait
wait2 == waitpid  [1]
wait3 == wait_ru
wait4 == waitpid_ru

So ok() and ok_autolabel().  Sure its more to type but that's just another way
of saying "don't use this".


[1] I couldn't find a wait2() anywhere, just waitpid().

-- 
Michael G Schwern        [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Don't step on my funk

Reply via email to