Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecode

[Dan Sugalski]

At 08:31 AM 9/27/00 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 02:40:27AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > I don't much care how its faked (if it is) as long as it works.
>
>Well, given that line disciplines means we have to write our own IO 
>subsystem, can't we fake it ourselves?

If we want, sure. I'm not sure it'd be worth it the first time around just 
for time to implement reasons, but there's no reason it can't get in later 
for the older platforms that don't do it.

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk