Chaim Frenkel wrote: > > What happens when Graham Barr decides to use throws in > his Net::* modules. These are some of the most useful modules that > I have been using. You have now forced me to switch to try/catch. If Graham decides to use throws in Net::* he would be the one forcing you to change, not me. I'm certainly not trying to force Graham to do anything, what he does is his business. If Graham decides that, given the power and simplicity of RFC 88, he wants to change the Net:: API, you'll have to take that up with him, not me. Yours, &c, Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handli... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: On the case for exception-based error ha... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based erro... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-based... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Tom Christiansen
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error ha... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handli... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error ha... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based erro... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Bennett Todd
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Bennett Todd