Glenn Linderman wrote: > > I think we agree that both/either type of APIs can be provided by a > module author with suitable wrappers. Or a module can provide one, and > another module written to wrap it and provide the other. I think we > agree that an exception, if thrown, should be caught and handled (perhaps > with a null handler), or the program should terminate. We agree. And the wrapper module is cool; hadn't thought 'bout that. Yours, &c, Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handli... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: On the case for exception-based error ha... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based erro... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-based... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Tom Christiansen
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error ha... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handli... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error ha... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based erro... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Bennett Todd
- Re: On the case for exception-b... Peter Scott