[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall) writes:
> While no assumption is going unquestioned for Perl 6, I do still
> believe that the decision not to overload + for concatenation is one
> of the few things I did right in Perl 1.  

Fair enough. And maybe I'm getting ahead of myself (or behind myself)
anyway. Presumably those who want Ruby-style can do something resembling

sub operator:+(STRING, STRING) { $^a ~ $^b }

anyway.

-- 
I've looked at the listing, and it's right!
                -- Joel Halpern

Reply via email to