Brad Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Piers Cawley wrote: [...]Nope, send it to TPF as discussed. It's what I've said in all the summaries after all. I just hope that a chunk of it ends up in Larry's pocket.
Does anyone know if TPF is set up to allow earmarked contributions?
Dunno. But I'm merely expressing a preference. TPF can do with it what they will.
Earmarked contributions are apparently somewhat dodgy from an IRS perspective--they don't want folks setting up a 503(c)(3) to do payroll stuff as a way to avoid taxes. (Rather than have an employee you have a grantee of a charity, thus the money you use to pay that person becomes a tax deduction, or something like that)
The TPF's grant fund stuff's OK, though. It's just a matter of getting a grantee for this year... (Working on that)
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
