Could you give a specific test case: - function to run - which PDL shell are you using
The pdl2 shell is based on Devel::REPL which from the Moose stuff spits out *huge* tracebacks on even simple errors. There is some filtering to skip the cruft but it is possible that the filter might need tuning. For perldl, I don't know but there are differences in the compile and execution environment between either shell and running in a script. My experience is that pdl2 is closer but haven't gotten many bug reports or feedback to improve things. I've fixing things I notice but that is far from exhaustive testing.... --Chris On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:58 AM, John Lapeyre <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > If a function calls 'barf', the pdl shell shows > no output. Is this expected ? > > debian pdl 1:2.4.10+dfsg-1 > > Thanks, > John _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
