On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:13 PM, John Lapeyre <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I recommend making the switch to pdl2 and >> reporting any problems with *that* shell so >> that it can continue to be improved in features >> and usability. > > I've got no problem with that. I just didn't realize > pdl2 was falling back to to the older version.
Yes, I did that to reduce the annoyance factor during the transitional period. The only downside for pdl2 is that it is based on Devel::REPL which depends on Moose stuff with its large number of dependencies. However, I have yet to hear of someone who has not been able to install the Devel::REPL + Moose stuff if desired. My hope is to use PAR packer to generate some "binary" installs for the Devel::REPL stuff to simplify startup for PDL users. As usual, that is in the queue with a lot of other PDL+POGL work... --Chris _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
