- How long have you used PDL? 2-3 months - What PDL version do you use? 2.4.11, +
- Best thing(s) about PDL * very easy to run on muti-core. ++++ * PDL interactive shell * very responsive community - Worst thing(s) about PDL * hard to find functionality, what I mean is if you don't know how to do something it is very hard to lookup keywords across multiply docs, FAQ's and book to find how to do it. - I would use PDL more (or at all) if only ... * have some sort of apply() outside perl function, so that PDL internalize it, so it run faster.... I've glossed over PP?..., seems like complicated stuff. * ability in PDL-shell to reload/re-use module without exiting the shell. * more integrated statistics capability * unified graphics interface (just a thought, I know it is not possible across so may divergent backends) - Any suggestions for PDL development? * ++ bit-field piddles..for high performance bitwise operations ++ i.e. bit-type * Look into R-language to steal some ideas. (ggplot,factors,...) * SQL-like primitive ops, may be a cool idea. On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear PDL Users- > > In an effort to gauge the progess of PDL development in functionality > and usability, I would invite you to reply to me or to list with a quick > message about your PDL use: > > - How long have you used PDL? > - What PDL version do you use? > - Best thing(s) about PDL > - Worst thing(s) about PDL > - I would use PDL more (or at all) if only ... > - Any suggestions for PDL development? > > The goal is to improve the PDL experience and to encourage a > broader PDL user community. > > Thanks much, > Chris Marshall (PDL-2.007 release manager) > > _______________________________________________ > Perldl mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
