On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:19, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:29, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> On ons, 2010-09-22 at 10:33 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >>>> It seems that the git move has broken the generation of the automatic >>>> snapshot tarballs - has anybody yet looked into what it would take to >>>> move those to fetching from git? >>> >>> Depends on what's "broken" about it, but I notice that the developer >>> docs and the NLS builds are also not updating. Perhaps something wrong >>> with the anoncvs service. >> >> anoncvs still serves the old cvs repository. > > Whens that due to be fixed? I imagine most of the buildfarm is testing > that still...
Don't have an actual time for that. Figured we'd leave the old one running until things have settled down. Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will export each branch as a module, rather than one module as pgsql. We can obviously get that working for the HEAD branch (by just mapping it to a branch called pgsql), but I don't know how doable that is for backbranches. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
