Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they
will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will
export each branch as a module, rather than one module as pgsql. We
can obviously get that working for the HEAD branch (by just mapping it
to a branch called pgsql), but I don't know how doable that is for
backbranches.
We need to have a fix for this before we can do any more backbranch
releases.
Fix for what, exactly? (assuming that people update their bf animals of course)
how exactly should people fix their BF members - is there any howto or
such on how to deal with the new git2cvs gateway?
Switching to git entirely is rather hard for some of my members for
example - at least not without investing hours of work...
Stefan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
