On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is > *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much > better to be inconsistent with previous versions)
Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"? Regards, Marti -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
