Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > On ons, 2012-06-20 at 13:26 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> That might actually be a good idea. We can't really change the way we >> named the betas, but it's not too late to consider naming the actual >> release as 9.2.0...
> The final release was always going to be called 9.2.0, but naming the > beta 9.2.0betaX is wrong. There was a previous discussion about that > particular point. Yes. There is no reason to change the naming scheme we have been using for years now (at least since version_stamp.pl was invented for 7.4). The only problem is that somebody got the name of the directory wrong on the FTP server. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers