On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Marti Raudsepp <ma...@juffo.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is >> *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much >> better to be inconsistent with previous versions) > > Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and > stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final > release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"?
That might actually be a good idea. We can't really change the way we named the betas, but it's not too late to consider naming the actual release as 9.2.0... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
