2012/6/21 Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net>: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Dickson S. Guedes <lis...@guedesoft.net> > wrote: >> 2012/6/20 Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net>: >>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Marti Raudsepp <ma...@juffo.org> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> >>>> wrote: >>>>> (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is >>>>> *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much >>>>> better to be inconsistent with previous versions) >>>> >>>> Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and >>>> stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final >>>> release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"? >>> >>> That might actually be a good idea. We can't really change the way we >>> named the betas, but it's not too late to consider naming the actual >>> release as 9.2.0... >> >> >> May be a symlink could be created just do fit the same pattern that other >> versions do and keeps the actual links (for beta) working. > > That we can do - in fact, done.
It works fine here, thanks! []s -- Dickson S. Guedes mail/xmpp: gue...@guedesoft.net - skype: guediz http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
