On tor, 2012-06-21 at 16:19 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Dickson S. Guedes <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 2012/6/20 Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>: > >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Marti Raudsepp <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is > >>>> *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much > >>>> better to be inconsistent with previous versions) > >>> > >>> Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and > >>> stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final > >>> release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"? > >> > >> That might actually be a good idea. We can't really change the way we > >> named the betas, but it's not too late to consider naming the actual > >> release as 9.2.0... > > > > > > May be a symlink could be created just do fit the same pattern that other > > versions do and keeps the actual links (for beta) working. > > That we can do - in fact, done.
Why not just move the whole thing and not increase the confusion? The press releases don't refer to the directory directly. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
