* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > Including all of the other names of people who made important > contributions, many of which consisted of reviewing, would make that > release note item - and many others - really, really long, so I'm not > in favor of that. Crediting reviewers is important, but so is having > the release notes be readable.
Agreed. > It has been proposed that we do a general list of people at the bottom > of the release notes who helped review during that cycle. That would > be less intrusive and possibly a good idea, but would we credit the > people who did a TON of reviewing? Everyone who reviewed even one > patch? Somewhere in between? Would committers be excluded because "we > just expect them to help" or included because credit is important to > established community members too? To what extent would this be > duplicative of http://www.postgresql.org/community/contributors/ ? I don't particularly like this idea. > I'm not necessarily averse to doing something here, but the reason why > nothing has happened has much more to do with the fact that it's hard > to figure out exactly what the best thing would be than any idea that > "we don't want to credit reviewers". We do want to credit reviewers, > AND WE DO, as a quick look at 'git log' will speedily reveal. Agreed. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
