On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It has been proposed that we do a general list of people at the bottom > of the release notes who helped review during that cycle. That would > be less intrusive and possibly a good idea, but would we credit the > people who did a TON of reviewing? Everyone who reviewed even one > patch? Somewhere in between? Would committers be excluded because "we > just expect them to help" or included because credit is important to > established community members too? To what extent would this be > duplicative of http://www.postgresql.org/community/contributors/ ?
Not much really, I tried to get my name on that list a couple of years ago, when i reviewed more than i do now, and never got it. And while my name is in a couple commit messages, that is a lot harder to show to people... you know, it's kind of frustrating when some not-yet customers ask for certificated engineers, and there isn't any official (as in "from community") certificate so you need to prove you're a contributor so let's see this random commit messages... -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación Phone: +593 4 5107566 Cell: +593 987171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
