On 2016-09-23 16:04:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Looking back over the thread, I see that you also proposed installing > isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress for the benefit of extensions. > I'm very much less excited about that idea. It'd be substantially more > dead weight in typical installations, and I'm not sure that it'd be useful > to common extensions, and I'm not eager to treat isolationtester's API > and behavior as something we need to hold stable for extension use.
FWIW, I'd be quite happy if it were installed. Running isolationtester when compiling extensions against distribution postgres packages would be quite useful. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
