Craig Ringer wrote: > On 27 October 2016 at 00:42, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> On 2016-09-23 16:04:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> Looking back over the thread, I see that you also proposed installing > >>> isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress for the benefit of extensions. > >>> I'm very much less excited about that idea. It'd be substantially more > >>> dead weight in typical installations, and I'm not sure that it'd be useful > >>> to common extensions, and I'm not eager to treat isolationtester's API > >>> and behavior as something we need to hold stable for extension use. > >> > >> FWIW, I'd be quite happy if it were installed. Running isolationtester > >> when compiling extensions against distribution postgres packages would > >> be quite useful. > > > > +1. > > Patch attached.
Hmm but this only installs isolationtester itself ... don't you need pg_isolation_regress too? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
