On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2016-09-23 16:04:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Looking back over the thread, I see that you also proposed installing >> isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress for the benefit of extensions. >> I'm very much less excited about that idea. It'd be substantially more >> dead weight in typical installations, and I'm not sure that it'd be useful >> to common extensions, and I'm not eager to treat isolationtester's API >> and behavior as something we need to hold stable for extension use. > > FWIW, I'd be quite happy if it were installed. Running isolationtester > when compiling extensions against distribution postgres packages would > be quite useful.
+1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
