On 14 November 2016 at 14:55, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 27 October 2016 at 00:42, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >>> On 2016-09-23 16:04:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> Looking back over the thread, I see that you also proposed installing >>>> isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress for the benefit of extensions. >>>> I'm very much less excited about that idea. It'd be substantially more >>>> dead weight in typical installations, and I'm not sure that it'd be useful >>>> to common extensions, and I'm not eager to treat isolationtester's API >>>> and behavior as something we need to hold stable for extension use. >>> >>> FWIW, I'd be quite happy if it were installed. Running isolationtester >>> when compiling extensions against distribution postgres packages would >>> be quite useful. >> >> +1. > > Patch attached.
As Andres pointed out elsewhere this is only half the picture. It should really add PGXS support for ISOLATION_TESTS and bringing up the test harness too. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
