On Wed, 19 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > There is no such thing as "too close to feature freeze", nor has there > > ever been in the past ... other then missing it altogether. Unless there > > are some serious flaws in the implementation, submitting it on May 31st > > would get it in ...it isn't expecting to be rock solid, bug free, that is > > what the beta period is to work out ... > > > > What is expected, though, is that you won't disappear after its committed, > > so that you can fix any bugs reported in a timely manner ... > > Not completely true. If a patch needs major rework or the implemention > isn't acceptable, it might be rejected and have to wait --- it has > happened before, and PITR might not make it because the April 1 patch > wasn't an acceptable implementation.
Which is why I stateed "unless there are some serious flaws in ... " :) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
