People, > >So, why tie it into the PostgreSQL source tree? Won't it be popular > >enough to live on its own, that it has to be distributed as part of the > >core?
Personally, I find it rather inconsistent to have any PL, other than PL/pgSQL, as part of the core distribution -- when we are pushing the interfaces, such as JDBC and libpqxx to seperate modules in pgFoundry. Either we're trying to lighten up the core, or we're not. But right now there seems to be no logic in operation. I do think, though, that we need some system to build RPMs for all the pgFoundry stuff ... -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
