Nope :(
Ben
On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:52, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> Strange. Pharo 2.0 does not seem to have the replication of repository
> instances problem. Any idea what introduced this?
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Benjamin
> <benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The thing is you use to have one instance of the same MCRepository per
> package.
> By example, the Pharo repository was in fact #{packageNumber} instances.
>
> So the change you make on one (by example, string your password) was not
> reflected to the others.
> And it seems that during the fix of this, this issue was introduced.
>
> (I think the easy solution taken was to have the same repositories for
> everything).
> It’s indeed kind of a paint o deal with, but a smaller one that it use to be
> :)
>
> Definitely it’s a bug, not a feature :)
> We should wait tip Guillermo’s answer since he was the one fixing this
> painful behaviour (2 sprints ago)
>
> Ben
>
> On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:44, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>
>> I do not understand what the password has to do with showing only the
>> relevant repositories for a selected package. Could you explain?
>>
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The idea was that repositories were shared among packages.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, you have to type your password a billion times
>>>
>>> Ben
>>>
>>> On 03 Nov 2013, at 21:49, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Indeed, I wanted to raise this issue as well. The Monticello browser is a
>>>> rather terrible interface, but at least the scoping of repositories was
>>>> useful. Is the change intentional, or is it a bug?
>>>>
>>>> Doru
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> Before, when one selects a package (left list), then only the set of
>>>> relevant repositories are displayed (right list). This is now not the case
>>>> anymore. I think I have seen somewhere a MC package is not associated to a
>>>> repository anymore. What is the idea behind this? I find this rather
>>>> convenient...
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre
>>>> --
>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>
>>>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"
