OK. We commited this: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12064/Selecting-a-package-in-the-Monticello-browser
Now you are able to change the behavior, either from the settings browser or either from right clicking on the right panel (repositories) in the Monticello Browser (there is a checkbox). Cheers, On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianop...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I do not like it either... but if there are more than one repository group >> (like before 1 per package) we have to make sure the repositories are >> unique >> per URL, otherwise you end up with different repositories which look the >> same >> but for instance do not have the same credentials, which was the problem >> we >> had back then. >> > > Cami, > > Say I have 2 different packages. Both have the PharoInbox and Pharo20 as > repos. > If I edit and add a password to the ones of the package1 and then I go to > package2, the password is kept. > And this is the case even for 2.0. > So maybe you are saying a different scenario? > > >> >> I remember that whenever we added a SLICE the inbox repository got >> duplicated >> causing qutie a bit of confusion, since you had to re-enter your password >> twice >> or more... >> >> >> On 2013-11-07, at 17:09, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianop...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > So we were discussing this here in the sprint. People say this is a >> feature. To be this is a bug. >> > >> > The change is in >> > >> > repositoryGroup >> > ^ workingCopy >> > ifNil: [MCRepositoryGroup default] >> > ifNotNil: [workingCopy repositoryGroup] >> > >> > which right now it is as >> > >> > repositoryGroup >> > ^ MCRepositoryGroup default >> > >> > So we will probably put a setting for the moment because we cannot >> agree. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Stéphane Ducasse < >> stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: >> > Ben >> > >> > this is good to share repositories :) >> > I got burned so many times while integrating changes back in Squeak 3.9 >> that this is the first things I did for the scriptLoader. >> > Now I do not see why when we select a package we should see the ones >> that are not associated with the package. >> > >> > Stef >> > >> > On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Benjamin < >> benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> The thing is you use to have one instance of the same MCRepository per >> package. >> >> By example, the Pharo repository was in fact #{packageNumber} >> instances. >> >> >> >> So the change you make on one (by example, string your password) was >> not reflected to the others. >> >> And it seems that during the fix of this, this issue was introduced. >> >> >> >> (I think the easy solution taken was to have the same repositories for >> everything). >> >> It’s indeed kind of a paint o deal with, but a smaller one that it use >> to be :) >> >> >> >> Definitely it’s a bug, not a feature :) >> >> We should wait tip Guillermo’s answer since he was the one fixing this >> painful behaviour (2 sprints ago) >> > >> > We can try to do something during the sprint thursday. >> > >> > >> >> Ben >> >> >> >> On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:44, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I do not understand what the password has to do with showing only the >> relevant repositories for a selected package. Could you explain? >> >>> >> >>> Doru >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Benjamin < >> benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> The idea was that repositories were shared among packages. >> >>>> >> >>>> Otherwise, you have to type your password a billion times >> >>>> >> >>>> Ben >> >>>> >> >>>> On 03 Nov 2013, at 21:49, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Indeed, I wanted to raise this issue as well. The Monticello >> browser is a rather terrible interface, but at least the scoping of >> repositories was useful. Is the change intentional, or is it a bug? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Doru >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel < >> alexandre.ber...@me.com> wrote: >> >>>>> Hi! >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Before, when one selects a package (left list), then only the set >> of relevant repositories are displayed (right list). This is now not the >> case anymore. I think I have seen somewhere a MC package is not associated >> to a repository anymore. What is the idea behind this? I find this rather >> convenient... >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Alexandre >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> >>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "Every thing has its own flow" >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> www.tudorgirba.com >> >>> >> >>> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Mariano >> > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >> >> > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com