So we were discussing this here in the sprint. People say this is a
feature. To be this is a bug.
The change is in
repositoryGroup
^ workingCopy
ifNil: [MCRepositoryGroup default]
ifNotNil: [workingCopy repositoryGroup]
which right now it is as
repositoryGroup
^ MCRepositoryGroup default
So we will probably put a setting for the moment because we cannot agree.
Cheers,
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.duca...@inria.fr>wrote:
> Ben
>
> this is good to share repositories :)
> I got burned so many times while integrating changes back in Squeak 3.9
> that this is the first things I did for the scriptLoader.
> Now I do not see why when we select a package we should see the ones that
> are not associated with the package.
>
> Stef
>
> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Benjamin <
> benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The thing is you use to have one instance of the same MCRepository per
> package.
> By example, the Pharo repository was in fact #{packageNumber} instances.
>
> So the change you make on one (by example, string your password) was not
> reflected to the others.
> And it seems that during the fix of this, this issue was introduced.
>
> (I think the easy solution taken was to have the same repositories for
> everything).
> It’s indeed kind of a paint o deal with, but a smaller one that it use to
> be :)
>
> Definitely it’s a bug, not a feature :)
> We should wait tip Guillermo’s answer since he was the one fixing this
> painful behaviour (2 sprints ago)
>
>
> We can try to do something during the sprint thursday.
>
>
> Ben
>
> On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:44, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>
> I do not understand what the password has to do with showing only the
> relevant repositories for a selected package. Could you explain?
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Benjamin <
> benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The idea was that repositories were shared among packages.
>
> Otherwise, you have to type your password a billion times
>
> Ben
>
> On 03 Nov 2013, at 21:49, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>
> Indeed, I wanted to raise this issue as well. The Monticello browser is a
> rather terrible interface, but at least the scoping of repositories was
> useful. Is the change intentional, or is it a bug?
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com>
> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Before, when one selects a package (left list), then only the set of
> relevant repositories are displayed (right list). This is now not the case
> anymore. I think I have seen somewhere a MC package is not associated to a
> repository anymore. What is the idea behind this? I find this rather
> convenient...
>
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
>
>
>
>
>
--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
