On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I do not like it either... but if there are more than one repository group > (like before 1 per package) we have to make sure the repositories are > unique > per URL, otherwise you end up with different repositories which look the > same > but for instance do not have the same credentials, which was the problem we > had back then. > Cami, Say I have 2 different packages. Both have the PharoInbox and Pharo20 as repos. If I edit and add a password to the ones of the package1 and then I go to package2, the password is kept. And this is the case even for 2.0. So maybe you are saying a different scenario? > > I remember that whenever we added a SLICE the inbox repository got > duplicated > causing qutie a bit of confusion, since you had to re-enter your password > twice > or more... > > > On 2013-11-07, at 17:09, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianop...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > So we were discussing this here in the sprint. People say this is a > feature. To be this is a bug. > > > > The change is in > > > > repositoryGroup > > ^ workingCopy > > ifNil: [MCRepositoryGroup default] > > ifNotNil: [workingCopy repositoryGroup] > > > > which right now it is as > > > > repositoryGroup > > ^ MCRepositoryGroup default > > > > So we will probably put a setting for the moment because we cannot agree. > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Stéphane Ducasse < > stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: > > Ben > > > > this is good to share repositories :) > > I got burned so many times while integrating changes back in Squeak 3.9 > that this is the first things I did for the scriptLoader. > > Now I do not see why when we select a package we should see the ones > that are not associated with the package. > > > > Stef > > > > On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Benjamin < > benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> The thing is you use to have one instance of the same MCRepository per > package. > >> By example, the Pharo repository was in fact #{packageNumber} instances. > >> > >> So the change you make on one (by example, string your password) was > not reflected to the others. > >> And it seems that during the fix of this, this issue was introduced. > >> > >> (I think the easy solution taken was to have the same repositories for > everything). > >> It’s indeed kind of a paint o deal with, but a smaller one that it use > to be :) > >> > >> Definitely it’s a bug, not a feature :) > >> We should wait tip Guillermo’s answer since he was the one fixing this > painful behaviour (2 sprints ago) > > > > We can try to do something during the sprint thursday. > > > > > >> Ben > >> > >> On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:44, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I do not understand what the password has to do with showing only the > relevant repositories for a selected package. Could you explain? > >>> > >>> Doru > >>> > >>> > >>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Benjamin < > benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> The idea was that repositories were shared among packages. > >>>> > >>>> Otherwise, you have to type your password a billion times > >>>> > >>>> Ben > >>>> > >>>> On 03 Nov 2013, at 21:49, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Indeed, I wanted to raise this issue as well. The Monticello browser > is a rather terrible interface, but at least the scoping of repositories > was useful. Is the change intentional, or is it a bug? > >>>>> > >>>>> Doru > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel < > alexandre.ber...@me.com> wrote: > >>>>> Hi! > >>>>> > >>>>> Before, when one selects a package (left list), then only the set of > relevant repositories are displayed (right list). This is now not the case > anymore. I think I have seen somewhere a MC package is not associated to a > repository anymore. What is the idea behind this? I find this rather > convenient... > >>>>> > >>>>> Alexandre > >>>>> -- > >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > >>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>>>> > >>>>> "Every thing has its own flow" > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>> > >>> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Mariano > > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com