Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could install packages from a ticket in the image? Something like
- get 3.0 image - fix from issue 12345 and issue 45678 and... - install own own packages - deploy It would be so well documented :) Norbert Am 25.06.2014 um 08:47 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>: > I only did it in 3.0 > The file out is attached to the slice - it is 100% standalone > > On 25 Jun 2014, at 00:45, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: > >> thank you, Sven. Did you try this in 3.0, too. I would need it there! >> >> Norbert >> >>> Am 25.06.2014 um 00:11 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>: >>> >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13395/Add-SHA256-HashFunction >>> >>> cleaned up, documented, properly packaged. >>> >>> Passes some test vectors. >>> >>> I changed the handling of the empty stream. >>> >>>> On 24 Jun 2014, at 23:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jan, >>>> >>>> I loaded just the class CFSHA256 and it worked perfectly (I didn't expect >>>> anything else). >>>> >>>> I tried some examples from Wikipedia >>>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sha256#Examples_of_SHA-2_variants): >>>> >>>> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog') hex. >>>> 'd7a8fbb307d7809469ca9abcb0082e4f8d5651e46d3cdb762d02d0bf37c9e592' >>>> >>>> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.') >>>> hex. 'ef537f25c895bfa782526529a9b63d97aa631564d5d789c2b765448c8635fb6c' >>>> >>>> So I will rename the class to SHA256, moving it to System-Hashing and add >>>> SHA256Tests for starters. >>>> >>>> Sven >>>> >>>>> On 20 Jun 2014, at 17:01, Jan van de Sandt <jvdsa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I added the SHA256 class to Cloudfork a few years ago. The class was >>>>> mostly copied from the Cryptography [1] project. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Jan. >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:56 AM, François Stephany >>>>> <tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Max, >>>>> >>>>> Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC so). I'm >>>>> no expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base implementation". >>>>> Someone with more knowledge can probably tell ;) >>>>> >>>>> Sven, >>>>> >>>>> The bare minimum to load it is: >>>>> >>>>> Gofer it >>>>> smalltalkhubUser: 'JanVanDeSandt' project: 'Cloudfork'; >>>>> package: 'Cloudfork-Common'; >>>>> package: 'Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform'; >>>>> load. >>>>> >>>>> The implementation is in Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look... >>>>> >>>>>> On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany <tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of >>>>>>> view to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 >>>>>>> class) in the System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 >>>>>>> and MD5) ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256 >>>>>> base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case >>>>>> I probably wouldn’t add it. In the latter case it’s open for discussion. >>>>>> Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not into >>>>>> System-Hashing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Max >>> >>> >> > >
