A patch mechanism ? That would be cool indeed, although probably not doable in all cases.
On 25 Jun 2014, at 10:23, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: > Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could install packages from a ticket in the > image? Something like > > - get 3.0 image > - fix from issue 12345 and issue 45678 and... > - install own own packages > - deploy > > It would be so well documented :) > > Norbert > > Am 25.06.2014 um 08:47 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>: > >> I only did it in 3.0 >> The file out is attached to the slice - it is 100% standalone >> >> On 25 Jun 2014, at 00:45, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: >> >>> thank you, Sven. Did you try this in 3.0, too. I would need it there! >>> >>> Norbert >>> >>>> Am 25.06.2014 um 00:11 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>: >>>> >>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13395/Add-SHA256-HashFunction >>>> >>>> cleaned up, documented, properly packaged. >>>> >>>> Passes some test vectors. >>>> >>>> I changed the handling of the empty stream. >>>> >>>>> On 24 Jun 2014, at 23:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Jan, >>>>> >>>>> I loaded just the class CFSHA256 and it worked perfectly (I didn't expect >>>>> anything else). >>>>> >>>>> I tried some examples from Wikipedia >>>>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sha256#Examples_of_SHA-2_variants): >>>>> >>>>> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog') >>>>> hex. 'd7a8fbb307d7809469ca9abcb0082e4f8d5651e46d3cdb762d02d0bf37c9e592' >>>>> >>>>> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.') >>>>> hex. 'ef537f25c895bfa782526529a9b63d97aa631564d5d789c2b765448c8635fb6c' >>>>> >>>>> So I will rename the class to SHA256, moving it to System-Hashing and add >>>>> SHA256Tests for starters. >>>>> >>>>> Sven >>>>> >>>>>> On 20 Jun 2014, at 17:01, Jan van de Sandt <jvdsa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I added the SHA256 class to Cloudfork a few years ago. The class was >>>>>> mostly copied from the Cryptography [1] project. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Jan. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:56 AM, François Stephany >>>>>> <tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Max, >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC so). >>>>>> I'm no expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base >>>>>> implementation". Someone with more knowledge can probably tell ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> Sven, >>>>>> >>>>>> The bare minimum to load it is: >>>>>> >>>>>> Gofer it >>>>>> smalltalkhubUser: 'JanVanDeSandt' project: 'Cloudfork'; >>>>>> package: 'Cloudfork-Common'; >>>>>> package: 'Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform'; >>>>>> load. >>>>>> >>>>>> The implementation is in Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look... >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany <tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of >>>>>>>> view to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 >>>>>>>> class) in the System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 >>>>>>>> and MD5) ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256 >>>>>>> base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case >>>>>>> I probably wouldn’t add it. In the latter case it’s open for >>>>>>> discussion. Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not >>>>>>> into System-Hashing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Max >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
