I can see how that makes sense for now - we will continue to make suggestions 
and then over time maybe we can help curate it it becomes too much. Although I 
am worried that this can create a lot of work - both to report and fix?
 
In the meantime how do you prefer we submit changes, in Markdown format (does 
that help?) - or is RTF better?  OR - is there any way we can commit proposed 
changes - which you can review and publish (e.g. could we use a Git Repo?). I'm 
not familiar with the underlying technology of Pharo.org - but could we modify 
it so there is a discussion page like on Wikipedia where changes can be 
proposed and applied by you?
 
This sounds like a great BOF topic at ESUG - and maybe we should follow up on 
that?
 
At the moment I can see numerous tiny fixes (grammatical and formatting - that 
are more time consuming to report than just fix).
 
For now, can you apply the newer fixes I proposed (to undo Stef's 
misunderstanding for my "use link" suggestion).
 
I also think on the http://pharo.org/download page we should mention the 
PharoLauncher project (http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/PharoLauncher) - 
its really handy for managing multiple images (and getting the latest image).
 
tim
 
 
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014, at 01:14 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> Hi, 
>  
> We love to have contributions, but for the moment being (to try to keep the 
> design, etc. and prevent too much disorder… which was a problem in the 
> previous site). 
> I would prefer you to send me your contributions (or post it here), and I 
> will upload them to the site. 
>  
> cheers, 
> Esteban
>  
> On 08 Aug 2014, at 12:11, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:
>  
>>  
>> Yes - it would be better to link to the YouTube  version in the text.
>>  
>> So how is the Pharo.org site generated? Is this what Pillar is? (Is it a 
>> pier wiki?) and could we easily help with editing a subsection of it to help 
>> out?
>>  
>> Tim
>>  
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>  
>> On 8 Aug 2014, at 10:52 am, "p...@highoctane.be" <p...@highoctane.be> wrote:
>>  
>>> I've uploaded the video on my channel as well.
>>>  
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFomI-7h4qQ
>>>  
>>> Phil
> 
>  
 

Reply via email to