I know!
Now I wanted to say that we are binding everything together. We are just
making the job of people like Pavel
and Guille more difficult. We should not expect that they will continue
to produce a modular core if we do not
pay attention like that. At least I would be them, I would stop.
If we decide to bind package that deep into the system (because String
is deep)
then may be we should have package inside Class definition themselves.
Stef
Le 23/2/15 15:53, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
Cool, we're back in business ;-)
yes but why having String>>asPackage is better?
Stef
I was commenting on the CI/Integration process, not this particular issue.
