> On 24 Feb 2015, at 07:49, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com> wrote: > > Just my 2 cents: > > I find this really useful and have already implemented this extension in a > couple of my packages, as writing: > > RuleChecker check: (RPackageOrganizer default packageNamed: ‘Kernel’) > > is much worse than: > > RuleChecker check: ‘Kernel’ asPackage > >
Sometimes I wonder if Packages should not be part of the Smalltalk globals namespace… e.g. packages could have a nice reflective API: MyPackage unload. and even an API for using… e.g. a Compiler has a very tiny surface API: OpalCompiler compile: ‘….’ (but I do not really like nested classes, which is what people will now suggest…) Marcus