Hi, On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2015-03-24 15:16 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: > >> >> On 24 Mar 2015, at 14:29, kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> There is a big diffirence between Morphic and the other. Morphic is a >> full solution and mature one as well. The others , with the exception of >> Bloc , try to wrap things up or offering better solution to some areas. >> >> >> The one thing I don't understand is why improving Morphic or even >> redesigning it is not even on the table. Looks to me like the least painful >> scenario. Unless thats the intention of Bloc to be the next generation of >> Morphic. In that case I am all for Bloc. >> >> >> if you read my mail, you will notice that I said BOTH are on the table >> (and we are actually moving oon both): >> - Bloc is the redesign >> - In the mean time we WORK and ENCOURAGE others to work on improve it. >> >> but Morphic it self has several fundamental flaws that cannot be fixed >> and that’s why in the long, very long way, needs to be replaced. >> > > One of the problem is that the Morphic replacement will probably be less > than Morphic was (or was intended to be) :( > > You'll probably tell me that for the kind of work we're doing in UI with > Pharo, we don't need the power of Morphic and I'd agree with you. > > Still, I will miss the demise of Morphic. > I think I do not understand this point. Why do you say that the future solution will be less than Morphic? Doru > > Thierry > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
