Hi, 2015-03-24 15:27 GMT+01:00 Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com>:
> Hi, > >> >> I think I do not understand this point. Why do you say that the future > solution will be less than Morphic? > > Because we're driving it with uses which are less than Morphic requirements were. Because you don't need Morphic power to do GT tools; it justs gets in the way: slow, over-engineered for that use case. As a consequence, you end up with Rubricks: dedicated, ad-hoc solution which is a far better match for its use case. That Rubricks proudly present its Z layering where Morphic was / is probably the easiest toolkit ever to do layering of arbitrary widgets on top of another? (*) Thierry (*) Even if we're not doing it(**). (**) Well, I did. Nobody's interested, so what ? > Doru > > >> >> Thierry >> > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" >
