I don't want to speak for him, but I think he meant Github. If what you want is visibility and relevance there is no OTHER place to get it.
It's not only about features (I use Bitbucket for my private projects), it's about marketing, it about appearing in reports like this: http://githut.info/ A big diamond hidden in bottom of ocean is worth less than a small diamond on a showcase. Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo 2015-10-22 12:46 GMT-03:00 Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com>: > I guess that Alexandre want to say git and not github. > > What is important is to have git support on Pharo in the future so we > can switch from github to bitbucket or any git hosting solution. > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:30 PM, monty <mon...@programmer.net> wrote: >> Github is a private VC funded company that we don't own that tomorrow could >> go away or adopt policies harmful to us. If Ruby can have rubygems.org (and >> if Steph can continue to get funding from INRIA/ESUG), then why can't we >> have something like STHub that's ours? >> >> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 11:19 AM >> From: "Alexandre Bergel" <alexandre.ber...@me.com> >> To: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed? >> >> On Oct 22, 2015, at 12:09 PM, monty <mon...@programmer.net> wrote: >> SmalltalkHub looks great but lacks the features of SqueakSource3. It would >> be great if we could switch the backend to SS3 while keeping the look of >> STHub. >> Having a reliable solution on GitHub will be even better in my opinion. >> Moreover, it will reveal that Pharo is within the top 20-languages. >> >> Alexandre >> > > > > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >
