2015-10-22 12:57 GMT-03:00 Andreas Wacknitz <a.wackn...@gmx.de>: > Am 22.10.15 um 17:30 schrieb monty: >> >> Github is a private VC funded company that we don't own that tomorrow >> could go away or adopt policies harmful to us. If Ruby can have rubygems.org >> (and if Steph can continue to get funding from INRIA/ESUG), then why can't >> we have something like STHub that's ours? >> >> > +1 > Github may be hip today but can be outdated in a few years. If Smalltalk > would have chosen a version management technology > that was en vogue in the 80s where would it be now? Does anybody even > remember one of those from then? > Having nice github integration (or whatever might be the technology of the > day) is one thing, completely relying on it is something > different.
We would be using SourceForge, probably :). Some projects still use it. Which ones? Well... the ones using Subversion, mostly old projects (although still maintained). But I couldn't find a new project choosing it over GitHub for code management. Esteban A. Maringolo
