I fail to see the problem here On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 1:52 AM p...@highoctane.be <p...@highoctane.be> wrote:
> Am still finding useful stuff on Squeak wiki, sorry. > The point of a Wiki is to capture discussions over a given topic and make > it grow into something more structured over time. Like original c2 wiki. > > Phil > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.al...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > If you miss it so much we have something much better > > Github wikis, we never use > > Each of our books is hosted in a Github repo and each repo always comes > with its own wiki using very simple markdown as everything else in Github > > You do not have content but only a snippet of code to offer ? No problem > we have you covered there too create a gist for it , link it in the wiki > and we will add it back to book. Gists even offer their own version control > which means you can keep working and improving your code snippet for years > to come without braking the workflow. > > Then its a question of copy pasting the contents to pillar and adding them > in our books , or if you do not mind the extra work write it in pillar > directly and add it to the relevant book > > All books can be added to CI and generate automagically html pages for > direct access , we do this already with PBE 5. > > Our Pharo "wiki" is easier to use and far more powerful than anything > Squeak ever had, no offence intended of course to the original creators and > maintainers of Squeak wiki. > > Also github offers hosting of static webpages we could have a website > hosted as github repo made with pillar that link to all wikis, gists and > book artifacts. I can create this in an hour of work its not big deal. I > would have done this myself but Stef already has added the books to > Pharo.org which I find is more or less the same thing. > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:15 PM philippe.b...@highoctane.be < > philippe.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I miss the Squeak wiki Pharo style. > > Phil > > Le 10 févr. 2017 19:06, "Esteban A. Maringolo" <emaring...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > 2017-02-10 14:59 GMT-03:00 p...@highoctane.be <p...@highoctane.be>: > > Mass adoption and hyper reduced friction to get people on board. > > > > For me: I have 10+ slack teams in my slack client and there is really no > > point in having more clients on the desktop. > > +1 to this. This is key. > > Maybe what we're missing is a simple wiki to collect the shared > knowledge, recipes, and other stuff. > > > Esteban A. Maringolo > > >
