I have the impression that we should rethink the meta interface of classes and reflective calls.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I wrote proposal in issue > > 2017-08-18 0:52 GMT+02:00 Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works>: >> >> Is this a goal we can all share for 7.0? >> >> Sort out the expert tools (like git etc), but equally enable that >> simplicity you expect for a child/newbie/expert... >> >> I'm in! >> >> Tim >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On 17 Aug 2017, at 20:52, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Hi guys >> > >> > my son coded in Pharo 60 >> > >> > testGuessUrlPart >> > >> > |dg8| >> > dg8 := GameItem new; >> > name: 'Dragon Quest VIII : Journey Of The Cursed King'; >> > console: 'PS2'. >> > self assert: dg8 guessUrlPart equals: >> > 'dragonquestviiijourneyofthecursedking' >> > >> > and guess what he broke the system. >> > >> > We should not accept such kind of behavior. >> > name: should not change the name of the class. >> > >> > I do not know the solution but I fear when I will teach 160 students >> > this fall. >> > We should make sure that Pharo is not a system only for experts! >> > >> > any idea is welcome >> > >> > >> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20322/name-sent-to-a-class-SHOULD-NOT-automatically-rename-and-destroy-the-class >> > >> > Stef >> > >> >> >
