On 17 August 2017 at 21:52, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We should not accept such kind of behavior. > name: should not change the name of the class. > I had exactly such a problem a couple of weeks ago :). I write MyClass on: foo; name: x; yourself'but I forgot the ^ return in MyClass class>>on: and so called name: on the class instead of the instance. Hilarity ensued :).
