I found a WfHistory package but don’t know how to write the beginHistory stuff. 
It seems to be a repository of versions of a process (maybe each step gives 
another version ?). 


> Le 27 oct. 2017 à 19:07, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Did you send pull requests?
> 
> Stef
> 
>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Cédrick Béler <cdric...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> A pleasure to discover ! To me, a wonderful(ly engineered) library.
>> 
>> Big thanks to Netstyle !
>> 
>> I’m just getting my hands around, but it looks to me like a great general 
>> purpose BP tool (modeling + engine + xpdl import export).
>> It would be very useful for IS in industrial contexts (*). And before all a 
>> superb starting point to model my simple personal routines as executable 
>> processes.
>> 
>> On the practical aspects, just a problem loading because of 
>> WADynamicVariable, but it kinds of load on Pharo 6.
>> Running tests, there are (naturally) some failures. I think most come from 
>> the removed links to Omnibase/History support and seaside 
>> (WADynamicVariable).
>> 
>> Some stuffs that are missing:
>> #isOmniBaseTransaction
>> #markDirty
>> A reference to TimeStamp fixed:
>> #beginInHistory
>> …
>> 
>> Need to fix WADynamicVariable with shouldn’t be hard.
>> The History link (persistence) is a bit more difficult as I don’t know its 
>> importance in the engine.
>> All Workflow object are managed object which (if I understand well) are 
>> persistent object. So maybe It need a (local) persistent alternative, a stub 
>> ?
>> 
>> Anyway, I need to understand more and I will probably come back with some 
>> questions about the dependencies and how to fix them.
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers and thanks again, enligthening code :)
>> 
>> Cédrick
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> * Interoperability of is a field I try carefully not to enter because I 
>> found not really fun (as most of the tool I’ve soon were java based … and 
>> slow… and java world !) but if only I had similar tools in pharo that could 
>> bring the fun back :)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 27 oct. 2017 à 09:37, Cédrick Béler <cdric...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Thank you!
>>> 
>>> I thons this just perfect as a starting point !
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Cedrick
>>> 
>>> Envoyé de mon iPhone
>>> 
>>>> Le 26 oct. 2017 à 19:38, Paul DeBruicker <pdebr...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> Maybe the package described here has what you're looking for :
>>>> 
>>>> http://forum.world.st/Ann-Workflow-td4963635.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Cédrick Béler wrote
>>>>> Hi again, this is my last question and the more general one of the day :-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’m looking for way of representing and executing simple "business
>>>>> processes" in Pharo and a way of declaring domain ontologies/taxonomies.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I didn’t find any lib around this subjects except some projects in other
>>>>> smalltalk dialects.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I just wander if somebody has done some work in these field. I’m also
>>>>> interested in (KISS) design discussions around these topics, hence this
>>>>> email.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don’t want to do a full fledged business process middleware.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would need :
>>>>> - a way to represent simple business processes (succession of activities
>>>>> with logic gates (and/or/xor) => I might be able to do that by myself).
>>>>> - a way to execute these processes (routines) in a semi-aotumatic manner
>>>>> => This looks more difficult to do to me.
>>>>> => my aim is to execute recurrent routines (my routines) with the help of
>>>>> a Pharo application
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> For such a system, I also need a way to categorize information context.
>>>>> Again, I don’t think I need a full fledged ontology implementation like
>>>>> Description Logic (or whatever). I think I’ll be happy with information
>>>>> tagging according to a predefined taxonomy. Instead of flat tags, I’d like
>>>>> them to implement some sort of multiple inheritance. For instance, I may
>>>>> need a tag #soccer that  "inherit" #sport.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Any information regarding taxonomy tagging in Pharo ? (Or eventually
>>>>> ontology?).
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> TIA,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cédrick
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to