> > Did you send pull requests? Euh, actually I still don’t really know how to use git.
I loaded it through metacello. Can I simply a sunlit code that way ? The code is quite documented already and there are tests. I kind of fixed some tests but not sure this was the way to do so (beginHistory has no action for instance). All the xpdl import/export fail but this is due to one method that need a DOMbuilder and two other class I have no clue. And I still haven’t find how to execute a process ^^ I’ll have another look today. Cheers, Cédrick > > Stef > >> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Cédrick Béler <cdric...@gmail.com> wrote: >> A pleasure to discover ! To me, a wonderful(ly engineered) library. >> >> Big thanks to Netstyle ! >> >> I’m just getting my hands around, but it looks to me like a great general >> purpose BP tool (modeling + engine + xpdl import export). >> It would be very useful for IS in industrial contexts (*). And before all a >> superb starting point to model my simple personal routines as executable >> processes. >> >> On the practical aspects, just a problem loading because of >> WADynamicVariable, but it kinds of load on Pharo 6. >> Running tests, there are (naturally) some failures. I think most come from >> the removed links to Omnibase/History support and seaside >> (WADynamicVariable). >> >> Some stuffs that are missing: >> #isOmniBaseTransaction >> #markDirty >> A reference to TimeStamp fixed: >> #beginInHistory >> … >> >> Need to fix WADynamicVariable with shouldn’t be hard. >> The History link (persistence) is a bit more difficult as I don’t know its >> importance in the engine. >> All Workflow object are managed object which (if I understand well) are >> persistent object. So maybe It need a (local) persistent alternative, a stub >> ? >> >> Anyway, I need to understand more and I will probably come back with some >> questions about the dependencies and how to fix them. >> >> >> Cheers and thanks again, enligthening code :) >> >> Cédrick >> >> >> >> * Interoperability of is a field I try carefully not to enter because I >> found not really fun (as most of the tool I’ve soon were java based … and >> slow… and java world !) but if only I had similar tools in pharo that could >> bring the fun back :) >> >> >> >> >> >>> Le 27 oct. 2017 à 09:37, Cédrick Béler <cdric...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> I thons this just perfect as a starting point ! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Cedrick >>> >>> Envoyé de mon iPhone >>> >>>> Le 26 oct. 2017 à 19:38, Paul DeBruicker <pdebr...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>> Maybe the package described here has what you're looking for : >>>> >>>> http://forum.world.st/Ann-Workflow-td4963635.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Cédrick Béler wrote >>>>> Hi again, this is my last question and the more general one of the day :-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I’m looking for way of representing and executing simple "business >>>>> processes" in Pharo and a way of declaring domain ontologies/taxonomies. >>>>> >>>>> I didn’t find any lib around this subjects except some projects in other >>>>> smalltalk dialects. >>>>> >>>>> I just wander if somebody has done some work in these field. I’m also >>>>> interested in (KISS) design discussions around these topics, hence this >>>>> email. >>>>> >>>>> I don’t want to do a full fledged business process middleware. >>>>> >>>>> I would need : >>>>> - a way to represent simple business processes (succession of activities >>>>> with logic gates (and/or/xor) => I might be able to do that by myself). >>>>> - a way to execute these processes (routines) in a semi-aotumatic manner >>>>> => This looks more difficult to do to me. >>>>> => my aim is to execute recurrent routines (my routines) with the help of >>>>> a Pharo application >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> For such a system, I also need a way to categorize information context. >>>>> Again, I don’t think I need a full fledged ontology implementation like >>>>> Description Logic (or whatever). I think I’ll be happy with information >>>>> tagging according to a predefined taxonomy. Instead of flat tags, I’d like >>>>> them to implement some sort of multiple inheritance. For instance, I may >>>>> need a tag #soccer that "inherit" #sport. >>>>> >>>>> Any information regarding taxonomy tagging in Pharo ? (Or eventually >>>>> ontology?). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> TIA, >>>>> >>>>> Cédrick >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >>>> >> >> >