It's interesting to note how this is similar to the way Microsoft is handling their workstation versus server OS releases. Notice that Windows XP (the desktop, workstation class OS) was released, without a Server counterpart. Later on, Microsoft releases Windows Server 2003. MS seems to be divorcing it's "enterprise" server OS from the desktop/workstation class.
Looks like Red Hat is doing the same thing. On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 11:53, Taylor, ForrestX wrote: > Rick Johnson wrote: > > Red Hat 9.0? What happened to 8.1? > > I am guessing that they made so many changes to the way that things are > named (Red Hat Enterprise Linux vs. Red Hat Linux) that they wanted to > make a fresh start. We'll see if they increase the major version number > every time they release a Red Hat Linux version. > > > > > There's going to be alot of RHCE's who are going to quickly be > > "non-current" if Red Hat chooses to increment in full x.0 releases. > > > > -Rick > > RHCE'd on 7.3 > > No doubt. I got my RHCE less than a year ago on 7.2... > > Forrest > -- > > > > > -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
