me thinks it's because of the new threading stuff. --Lou
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 16:13, The Matt wrote: > On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:45, William Hooper wrote: > > Rick Johnson said: > > > Michael St. Laurent wrote: > > >> I just got an end-of-life notification for an old system.[snip] > > > > If you have a basic subscription to RHN you get an announcement also. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Red Hat 9.0? What happened to 8.1? > > > > Binary compatibility. RH always goes to x.0 when they don't preserve > > binary compatibility. Now you know why some people (like me) think it was > > silly to be calling it RH 8.1 beta in the newsgroups. > > Wait, binary broke between 8.0 and Phoebe? I thought Phoebe used gcc > 3.2 and glibc 2.3, or did I not look close enough? (I'm not on my > Phoebe=home machine at the moment.) > > Are they going to go to gcc 3.3 or 3.4, then? -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
