On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:45, William Hooper wrote: > Rick Johnson said: > > Michael St. Laurent wrote: > >> I just got an end-of-life notification for an old system.[snip] > > If you have a basic subscription to RHN you get an announcement also. > > >> > > > > > > Red Hat 9.0? What happened to 8.1? > > Binary compatibility. RH always goes to x.0 when they don't preserve > binary compatibility. Now you know why some people (like me) think it was > silly to be calling it RH 8.1 beta in the newsgroups.
Wait, binary broke between 8.0 and Phoebe? I thought Phoebe used gcc 3.2 and glibc 2.3, or did I not look close enough? (I'm not on my Phoebe=home machine at the moment.) Are they going to go to gcc 3.3 or 3.4, then? -- "And isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony, anyway? I mean, all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, ooh ooh ooh, the sky's the limit!" -- The Tick The Matt -- http://ucsub.colorado.edu/~thompsma/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
