Got both this one and the original one a few minutes ago, PF, just so's ya
knows.




----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Fraser" <pjfra...@alamedanet.net>
To: "Antique Phonograph List" <phono-l@oldcrank.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 12:04 AM
Subject: [Phono-L] Fwd: Jack Mullin tape...was Re: Victor long
playingrecords


> trying again.  is the list broken?
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: Peter Fraser <pjfra...@alamedanet.net>
> > Date: May 19, 2006 8:14:53 PM PDT
> > To: Antique Phonograph List <phono-l@oldcrank.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Jack Mullin tape...was Re: Victor long
> > playing records
> >
> > Group -
> >
> > I've burned a mess of them and have started assembling the
> > packages, to mail tomorrow.
> >
> > If you've already asked for one, I've emailed you the details and
> > you know what to do next regarding payment...
> >
> > It's not too late for anyone else to sign up for one;  send me your
> > name and address and I'll send you the paypal/etc info.
> >
> > -- Peter
> >
> > On May 2, 2006, at 9:45 PM, Peter Fraser wrote:
> >
> >> Doug's going to burn a DVD of it and then send that to me for
> >> duplication.  So you can start sending me emails with your
> >> addresses.  be sure to put "Mullin" in the header of the message.
> >>
> >> On May 2, 2006, at 4:01 PM, pjfra...@alamedanet.net wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have a unit which burns DVDs directly from VHS tapes, and would
> >>> gladly
> >>> burn copies of this for list-pals, for the cost of postage...if
> >>> Doug would
> >>> see fit to lend it out for that purpose.  Doug?
> >>>
> >>> -- peter
> >>> pjfra...@alamedanet.net
> >>>
> >>> Doug wrote:
> >>>> The Antique Radio Club Of Illinois sold a videotape a few years
> >>>> ago,
> >>>> titled:" An Afternoon With Jack Mullin". It runs 50 minutes, and I
> >>>> believe
> >>>> that it was put out by the Audio Engineering Society. I have a
> >>>> copy, and
> >>>> watch it occasionally. He covers early phonograph history very
> >>>> well, and
> >>>> has
> >>>> an outstanding demonstration of the same Victor record playing on
> >>>> acoustical, then switching to Orthophonic. He was a fine
> >>>> collector of
> >>>> phonographs and tape devices.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "Robert Wright" <esrobe...@hotmail.com>
> >>>> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <phono-l@oldcrank.org>
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 6:02 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Victor long playing records
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> From: "Doug" <cdh...@earthlink.net>
> >>>>>> I can't imagine any record maker in the thirties intending their
> >>>>>> discs
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>> played with a sound box.>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Were the heavy electric pickups any better?  I had a Brunswick
> >>>>> Panatrope
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> a while, and though I never got the amp working, the GE/RCA motor
> >>>>> worked
> >>>>> great, quiet and steady.  The pickup head was hinged but not
> >>>>> counterbalanced, and it could eat through 30's 78's with the
> >>>>> best of
> >>>>> 'em.
> >>>>> (The 'plinth' board, if you will, also generated a roomful of
> >>>>> acoustic
> >>>>> output.)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> All right, on another topic. Magnetic tape recording was IN
> >>>>>> USE in
> >>>>>> Germany
> >>>>>> in the thirties. Do you think that the recording companies in
> >>>>>> this
> >>>>>> country
> >>>>>> didn't know about it? It would be a threat to their markets to
> >>>>>> have a
> >>>>>> recordable medium in the hands of buyers who would otherwise buy
> >>>>>> disc
> >>>>>> recordings. It proved to be just that, after Jack Mullin
> >>>>>> imported his
> >>>>>> two
> >>>>>> Magnetophones at the end of WWII, and Crosby went on the air,
> >>>>>> using one
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>> them in 1947.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With what Germany was brewing up during that time, I wonder if any
> >>>>> technology was leaving the German borders.  I'm no WWII expert,
> >>>>> but
> >>>>> I've
> >>>>> always just assumed there was an iron veil over all the
> >>>>> sciences in
> >>>>> 30's
> >>>>> Germany.  This article on John Mullin touches on this, saying that
> >>>>> "Although
> >>>>> the German technical press covered advances during the 1920s, the
> >>>>> '30s,
> >>>>> and
> >>>>> even the early 1940s, Britons and Americans were largely
> >>>>> unaware of
> >>>>> these
> >>>>> technology developments."  It's a fascinating read and answers a
> >>>>> lot of
> >>>>> questions (while raising a few); here's the link:
> >>>>> http://www.tvhandbook.com/History/History_mullin.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One wonders.  The first magnetic recording was demonstrated in
> >>>>> 1898 by
> >>>>> a
> >>>>> Danish inventor named Poulsen.  Seems the more we know, the more
> >>>>> there
> >>>>> is
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> learn.  I'm gonna go finish that Mullin article.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -r.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Phono-L mailing list
> >>>>> Phono-L@oldcrank.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Phono-L Archive
> >>>>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Support Phono-L
> >>>>> http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Phono-L mailing list
> >>>> Phono-L@oldcrank.org
> >>>>
> >>>> Phono-L Archive
> >>>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/
> >>>>
> >>>> Support Phono-L
> >>>> http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Phono-L mailing list
> >>> Phono-L@oldcrank.org
> >>>
> >>> Phono-L Archive
> >>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/
> >>>
> >>> Support Phono-L
> >>> http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Peter
> >> pjfra...@alamedanet.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Phono-L mailing list
> >> Phono-L@oldcrank.org
> >>
> >> Phono-L Archive
> >> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/
> >>
> >> Support Phono-L
> >> http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> Phono-L@oldcrank.org
>
> Phono-L Archive
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/
>
> Support Phono-L
> http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank
>

Reply via email to