No problem. Understood about the table issue, but it's normally not
the downloading of the HTML that's as much a problem as the rendering,
in my experience, with netscape.
I'm the last person who would adopt this attitude, but...
Check your stats? How many IE users? How many NS users?
The 'solution' is one which by definition CAN'T work with NS.
It may not be an IE only thing - not sure about opera or lynx or
konqueror with gzip stuff. But don't look at it like an IE only thing.
Just a non-NS thing. It's their own damn fault.
If you've got a lot of traffic, the gzip can save a lot of bandwidth.
Especially if 80% of your traffic is IE anyway.
Good luck.
Renze Munnik wrote:
> A well... what shall I say. I have to agree with you _A LOT_!!!
> Netscape ruled, but doesn't anymore. It's a damn shame. They pretty
> much stick to the standards (which I like very much) but the program
> (browser) is f*cked up.
>
> Anyway... My pages contain some tables about three within each
> other. And NS can't handle tables to good. So if there is any
> browser I'd want to use compression for... it'd be NS. That way the
> data would be faster there and NS should have more time to process
> it. So I'm not realy looking for I solution that only works for IE.
> Because only compressing it for IE was something I'd thought about
> already, but I don't realy think it's a reasonable option.
>
> But... Thanks for spending your time to my problem!
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
